Skip to main content
CIMug > Redmond2008
Login | Join | Help (new window)

Modify settings and columns

Redmond2008 > Meeting Evaluation  

Meeting Evaluation

A survey to get your feedback on the 2008 Redmond meeting. One response per site account is allowed. Responder names will not be shown in the results.
  
View: 

1. Please rate the value of these aspects of the conference to your needs.

  
Low
Medium
High
(%)084646
CIM University (Mon)
   
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)031690
Project Presentations (Tue)
   
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)838540
Smart Grid Panel (Wed)
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)038620
Working Group Breakout Tracks (Wed)
   
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)015778
Vendor Hospitality Event (Wed)
   
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)046540
User Group Presentations (Thur)
   
 
 
 
  
123Not Applicable

Total: 13

2. Please rate your experience for the following aspects of the conference.

  
Below Average
Average
Above Average
(%)815770
Pre-Conference Information
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)8541523
Hotel Facilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 123Not Applicable
(%)08920
Meeting Rooms
   
 
 
 
  
 123Not Applicable
(%)08858
Meeting Meals
   
 
 
 
 
 
123Not Applicable

Total: 13

3. How important is the CIM User Group web site to you?

 Don't Know
 (8%) 
 
 Not important
 (0%)  
 Very valuable
 10 (77%) 
 
 New to the CIMug but will become important
 (8%) 
 
 I consider it a critical and required resource.
 (8%) 
 

Total: 13

4. Will your active participation in CIMug increase in 2009? (See opportunities listed at http://cimug.ucaiug.org/Meetings/Redmond2008/Meeting%20Wiki/Volunteer%20Opportunities.aspx.)

 Yes
 (54%) 
 
 No
 (0%)  
 Not Sure
 (46%) 
 

Total: 13

5. What suggestions do you have to make this conference more valuable to you and your company?

 
 (9%) 
 
 
More interaction with users on CIMug activities and directions in order to get our group more focused and increase user participation.
 (9%) 
 
 
 (9%) 
 
 
 
 (9%) 
 
 
 (9%) 
 
 
Hands on tutorial on UML modeling and how to read models. Also a tutorial on using TOOLS in a production enviroment.
 (9%) 
 
 
Online access.
 (9%) 
 
 
 (9%) 
 
 
- Share documents such as technical papers, CIM bibliography, current model releases, concrete feedback from EPRI projects (e.g. profile documents, UML enhancements), Interop test reports, etc.
 
 (9%) 
 
 
Continue with reference examples.  Continue to improve toolsets.  Continue with CIM training and since many people are using CIM to drive message payload definition - should add that to the training and presentation topics.
 (9%) 
 
 
Invite attendees to mention their current highest priority topic of interest and allow time for 'birds of a feather' to promote discussions between members interested in same topic.
 (9%) 
 

Total: 11

6. What do you like best about the CIM User Group?

 
 (8%) 
 
 
Randy Rhodes
 (8%) 
 
 

The collaboration with the experts is very valuable.

 (8%) 
 
 
 (8%) 
 
 
Great Job by all.  Particuarly Larry on the facility...  Any Randy on the Web Site and hurding cats.  Keep up the good work...
 (8%) 
 
 
1) Mondays CIM 101 course was terrific.
2) Panel on Tuesday was terrific. Do one each day in the future.
3) Having presentations available immediately (and organizaed) was wonderful.
 (8%) 
 
 
The presentations on usage of cims and the working groups.
 (8%) 
 
 
Discussions and time in the breakout sessions.
 (8%) 
 
 
 (8%) 
 
 
- Meeting with CIM experts and utilities, share issues and solutions.
 
 (8%) 
 
 
 (8%) 
 
 
 (8%) 
 

Total: 12