|
A survey to get your feedback on the 2009 Charlotte meeting. One response per site account is allowed. Responder names will not be shown in the results.
1. Please rate the value of these aspects of the conference to your needs.
| | | | | | | (%) | 0 | 0 | 67 | 33 |
| CIM University (Mon) | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 0 | 0 | 67 | 33 |
| Project Presentations (Tue) | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| Smart Grid Panel (Wed) | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 0 | 33 | 67 | 0 |
| Working Group Breakout Tracks (Wed) | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 0 | 67 | 0 | 33 |
| Vendor Hospitality Event (Wed) | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 0 | 0 | 67 | 33 |
| User Group Presentations (Thur) | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
|
Total: 3 |
2. Please rate your experience for the following aspects of the conference.
| | | | | | | (%) | 0 | 67 | 33 | 0 |
| Pre-Conference Information | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 33 | 0 | 67 | 0 |
| Hotel Facilities | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 |
| Meeting Rooms | | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
| (%) | 0 | 33 | 67 | 0 |
| Meeting Meals | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | Not Applicable |
|
Total: 3 |
3. How important is the CIM User Group web site to you?
|
| | Don't Know |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | Not important |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | Very valuable |
| | | 3 (100%) | |
|
|
Total: 3 |
4. Will your active participation in CIMug increase in 2010? (See opportunities listed at http://cimug.ucaiug.org/Meetings/Charlotte2009/Meeting%20Wiki/Volunteer%20Opportunities.aspx.)
|
| | Yes |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
| | No |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | Not Sure |
| | | 2 (67%) | |
|
|
Total: 3 |
5. What suggestions do you have to make this conference more valuable to you and your company?
|
| | The presentations, discussions and demonstrations are extremely valuable! It is discouraging that it is not available in a recorded manner to bring to the software teams that I will be working with in the next 12 months. This is the braintrust of actually getting these systems to work. It is in the interest of our nation and the world to get this knowledge into the hands of every vendor, integrator, and architect working on utility projects. Perhaps we need to find a simple commercial model that compensates the early movers for having gotten us this far, and share their wisdom. |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
| | The general UCA sites need to be more usable. Engaging a web usability person might be a good idea. |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
| | as has already been suggested, a Utility "track". |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
Total: 3 |
6. What do you like best about the CIM User Group?
|
| | Every contributor is committed, the program is crisply assembled, the leaders are moving the effort into the SmartGrid fray with confidence. |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
| | Getting connected with other utilities trying to tackle similar problems. |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
| | Much better understanding of all these organizations now. |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
Total: 3 |
|
|
|
|